Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

Elevate PID

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Project Name

Elevate Desk

Designer/s

MinaBassilious (Unlicensed) Jordan Ruchalski

Project Deliverable

Design, develop & commercialize a motorized sit/stand desk

Start Date

Target Launch

Autumn 2023

Target Price Range

$1,500 - $2,000

Internal Resource Est.

0.25 – 0.5 FTE During development & design Project Length = 9 – 12 months

Project Budget

Exp. CAPEX Cost

Product Proposition

Currently King Living offers a limited range of desks and home office furniture. To fill this gap in the KING range a sit/stand desk is to be design, developed and commercialised.

Traditionally a sit/stand desk have a very distinct style. This style while practical, does not suit the home office in style. A more designer, and less utilitarian style is required for home office and KING difference, where the desk in the sitting position depicts as a standard desk.

 

The Elevate desk will come in one size and is to feature the following:

 

  • Solid timber tabletop, American oak & walnut

  • Blade style veneered legs, with curve hints to conform with the KING style moving forward

  • Medium size, approximately 1600mm * 800mm

  • Sympathetic to future KING office chair

  • Differentiate from the Eto desk


Range Gap

What gap in the range is this product addressing?


Requirements for Success

What is the target requirements to make this a successful project?

Requirements

Vertically moves for sit/stand function

Minimum height = comfortable just sitting desk

Maximum height = 1100mm - 1200mm

Aesthetically is not perceived as sit/stand desk

Solid timber tabletop - American Oak & Walnut

Motor must be concealed neatly

Suits KING modern style when it is extended - sleek, neat & considered

Cable management to be considered, end user needs to “not know about it”

Flat pack and easy assembly

Discreet user interface

Differentiate from Eto desk


Key Risks & Considerations

What are the key risks involved in the project?

e.g. manufacturing risks, design complications, bottlenecks in the timeline, commercialization risks, brand discrepancies

Key Risks

Risk Mitigation Plan (Concept Refinement)

WFH reducing as Covid becomes an endemic

Mostly dependable on 3rd party manufactures, risk in not owning manufacturing process, slim margins

Table stability & compliance

Pinch Hazard & compliance

Electrical compliance and safety compliance


Design, Develop & Test

What Must be Designed?

  • Initial Concept

What must be Developed?

  • Desk tabletop

  • Tabletop frame

  • Desk legs and feet

  • Motor mounting and integration

  • Cable management

What must be tested?

  • Motor functionality and load capacity

  • Desk tabletop strength

  • Desk legs and feet strength

  • Motor mounting and integration

  • Assembly process, strength and rigidity

  • User testing


Manufacturing Scope

Manufactured In-house

  • Steel frame (welding jigs)

  • Packaging and assembly (may have packaging inserts, may need mold)

  • Possibility to make legs inner construction in house

Procured Externally

  • Tabletop

  • Legs with adjustable feet

  • Motor and ancillaries

  • Mounting plates and integration

  • Cable management


Resourcing Estimates

Project Length

P I

r n

o t

j e

e n

c s

t i

t

y

Less than 3 months

3 - 6 months

6 - 9 months

9 - 12 months

12 months +

High

Designer = 1.0 FTE +

Medium

High

Very High

Very High

Very High

High-Med

Designer = 0.75 - 1.0 FTE

Medium

High

High

Very High

Very High

Med

Designer = 0.75 - 0.5 FTE

Low

Medium

High

High

Very High

Med-Low

Designer = 0.5 - 0.25 FTE

Low

Low

Medium

Medium

High

Low

Designer = 0 - 0.25 FTE

Low

Low

Low

Low

Medium


360 Marketing

  • For marketing to complete

  • 360 Marketing plan


Sustainability

•How is this product going to hint towards the sustainable future KING strives for?


Return on Investment

  • No labels